I bumped into a design-based hurdle yesterday when I was working on my Honours yesterday. I was working on an Eastern Fantasy tank when I really began thinking about the difference between Eastern and Western fantasy. When I struggled to objectively categorise them, I considered just compiling them both into fantasy. However, that wouldn't be right because, though I can't put my finger on it, there is a difference. Lord of the Rings and Final Fantasy are very distinctly different.
But how?
I came up with a few ideas, but none of them could be considered definite differences. There was always an exception.
1) Mythology
Western tends to use creatures that have never really been thought to exist, such as orcs and elves (A lot of things like this bother me because they're clearly someone else's reused ideas). Eastern has dragons and chi and things like that.
But this instantly falls through when you consider Gandalf and Harry Potter. These are big characters, and back in the day people did think witchcraft was real. So there is real life influencing it. Also, knights definitely existed, and dragons were rumoured to. So they do take some 'real' elements.
As well as this, Eastern Fantasy is not all about mythology. Take Dragonball as an example. Sure, it's based around Journey To The West, but I'm sure stretchy alien Piccolo and pink rubbery villain Buu were not part of that.
2) Abilities
Maybe it's just the style of powers used. West is swords and bows, East is magical powers. Right?
Well, no. Wizards use magical powers (Though they are less common in the West), and many characters in East have some sort of weaponry.
3) Beauty
I read a good article about a similar point (
www.armchairarcade.com/neo/node733 ), though it was about the 'cuteness' of the East. I was thinking about it more in terms of the elegance of the East, in the way that nothing is particularly ugly. For example, an orc in the West is very ugly. Compare that to the droves of cutesy little anime girls that may be seen in the East.
Basically, West has more grit and East has more elegance.
But the article brings up Disney films in it, and I think this goes against the point I believed. The Little Mermaid portrays a pretty and cute heroine with an attractive love interest. Other characters may be less attractive, but the main ones are what I'd expect from the East. However, I guess a difference is that hero Eric is a strong, beefy man compared to cutesy little Tidus from Final Fantasy...
... But compare and contrast superhero Goku from Dragonball. He is absolutely not the elegant, slender stereotype I believed.
4) Colour
This is the closest I think I may have come. West is earthy greens and browns, East is pastels and bright colours. I suppose in this way, West can be thought of as more 'foresty', whereas East is sort of 'spacey'. Though East can also be set in an old-timey environment like West often does, the clothes are frequently bizarre and bright.
Obviously there are exceptions.
5) Art style
East is anime-children, West is busty women? East is pretty beasts, West is hideous trolls?
I don't know.
I give up.
All I can guess is that these are some criteria, and each genre can pick and choose between a couple. They may tend to lean in one direction, but could perhaps not stick to every cliché.
I just don't know.
baw